NOTES FROM THE BARGAINING BUBBLE #17
by Bert Thomas, UCLA Representative, CUE BARGAINING TEAM
(A personal diary, not the Official Report)
UC DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER SACRAMENTO, July 11-12, 2005
"PLAYED AND BETRAYED" IN SACRAMENTO
A little bit heart-breaking, if you want to know. Even after a year of
it, I'm just not used to dealing with people like this. Amateur human
beings. And I'm old...I ought to know better. I don't think any of us
saw it coming.
Hopes were high after the previous session in San Francisco. The State
budget had just been signed. UC President Bob Dynes had just published
an upbeat assessment of funding prospects for worker wages in his
newsletter. The Berkeley Lab had settled with CUE. We believed that
proposals CUE Chief Negotiator Amatullah Alaji-Sabrie had posted on the
wall at the end of the San Francisco meetings were in line with
University Negotiator Peter Chester's declared interests. He even
agreed that they were "on the right track," and we assured him that we
would seek CUE's Statewide Executive Board authorization to develop
these proposals in an effort to reach agreement.
The CUE Executive Board had met two days prior to our Sacramento
bargaining session to approve this direction, and on the first day of
bargaining--after a short time sparring with a much reduced University
team (Mr. Chester, Susan Wright of UC San Francisco, and pleasant,
stoical Patty Donnelly of OP taking notes)--the teams agreed to go into
caucus for preparation of CUE's new proposals on:
- ACCESS/UNION RIGHTS
- INDEMNIFICATION
- LABOR-MANAGEMENT MEETINGS
- REHABILITATION/REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION
- UNIVERSITY BENEFITS, and
- WAGES!
WRITING, PRINTING, RE-WRITING, RE-PRINTING...
At 2:00pm, the teams re-convened briefly to agree on a long list of
contract articles where "Current Contract Language" would remain in
effect. These would not require further negotiation, presumably, if an
agreement were to be signed today.
We remained in caucus composing, re-wording and printing contract
articles until 8:30pm. We had notified the University team that our
teeny little printer was slow, out of ink, and that we were unlikely to
complete the projects before the following morning. And thanks to the
tireless efforts of Chief Negotiator Amatullah Alaji-Sabrie of UC
Berkeley, Mary Higgins (UCSF), Shann Ritchie (UC Santa Cruz), Norine
Shima (UC Berkeley), Lyn Kelly (UCLA), Alice Guillory (UCSF) with Cynthia
Norman (UC Irvine) and Mary Jo Kelly (UC Davis) whacking away at the two
computers, flash drives, and a printer that gave up at some point, and
Melinda Gandara (UC Santa Barbara) hustling between the hotel's business
center copier, computer and the caucus room...the job got done. Between
admiring all this activity and dozing off, I think my main contribution
to the enterprise was ordering coffee and treats and offering to hobble
around the room naked...the mere thought of which alarmed my team-mates
and spurred them to greater effort.
At 11:00am the next day, CUE presented Mr. Chester with proposals for:
- LABOR-MANAGEMENT MEETINGS (Article 12)
- INDEMNIFICATION (Article 11), and
- UNIVERSITY BENEFITS (Article 42)
The University team asked for a caucus to study these--mainly the
Benefits article. They returned at 1:30pm, at which time CUE presented
proposals for the remaining 3 Articles we'd been crafting:
- ACCESS/UNION RIGHTS (Article 1)
- REHABILITATION/REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION (Article 31)
- WAGES (Article 45)
IT'S ABOUT TO GET STUPID & UGLY HERE...
TIME FOR A TOUCHING CHILDHOOD MEMORY
When you were little, I bet there was a kid from up the street--a rich
kid, usually--who was no fun to play with, except she had a bat and a
ball and a big yard...or he had more dolls and dishes than you. (Don't
look to me for gender stereotypes, I'm no fool.) And remember how this
sniveling little putz/princess was always threatening to take the
ball-and-bat/dolls-and-dishes and go home if they didn't get their way?
Remember? And if you were lucky, you had parents who explained to you,
in loving terms, that these "spoiled little snots" would "get the crap
banged out of them" one day...but in the meantime, the "precious little
farts" would have no true friends, would grow up selfish, bitter, and
creepy, feeling sorry for themselves, whining ("mewling and puking" I
think Shakespeare called it), and still hate themselves after many years
of therapy. Better to let them hang out with their own kind, your Mom
said... better than constantly begging your Dad to go over to their house
and kick their butts.
O, and then to have to meet them as "adults"...for behold, one of them
has turned out to be your bully boss. Alas, they're now too old--and so
are you--for an honest and direct butt-kicking, which seems so clearly
indicated. Now it must be done with "labor negotiations" and lawyers.
You can still apply your boot to their bunda, in a metaphysical sense,
but it's never going to be as satisfying as an honest contact of shoe
leather with squishy, pretentious bum, you know?
At this point, let me refer you to the official CUE BARGAINING REPORT #8
(at the CUE website, URL below) for a more objective report than this is likely to be.
PETER WORKS ALONE
At 4:00pm, when the University team returned from its caucus to consider
all we'd laid before them, it was down another member. Susan Wright had
gone, leaving only Mr. Chester and Ms. Donnelly, his note-taker. Mr.
Chester was working solo, in effect. It was all up to him, and he
handled it, by golly...just like that kid from up the street. A gambler
would call it: overplaying your hand.
LABOR-MANAGEMENT MEETINGS: "We're concerned that employees must treat
management with respectful, fair treatment..." (Excuse me?)
REHABILITATION/REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION: "You've removed our language
about the University's 'defenses'..." (Yeah, we did... "defenses"
against disabled workers.)
UNIVERSITY BENEFITS: "A rural subsidy for Health Benefits (where a less
costly HMO is not available--in Santa Cruz, for example) is not OK with
us." (Roughly the same as advice offered up in our San Francisco
meetings... that people with low pay "should consider finding a job at
another campus.")
WAGES:
- "AA IV is not OK with us."
- "We'll take our chances at PERB on the 2 Bonus Days (Holiday
curtailment); we're not going to move on this."
- A $750 signing bonus? That's $12 million...pretty high."
("Well, it's not $20 million!" snapped CUE's Amatullah, referring to
the funds diverted from clerical raises last year.)
- "CUE hasn't made any concessions," he decided. He announced he would
need caucus time to present a new proposal on Wages.
WILL THE REAL UNIVERSITY PLEASE STAND UP
After roughly 20 minutes, at 5:10pm, Mr. Chester produced multiple copies
of a WAGES counter-proposal that was neither responsive nor bore any
apparent relation to the CUE wage proposal we'd just given him. It was
at this moment we knew we'd been had. I'll wager one of my important
body-parts that this "counter" had been growing cold in his briefcase
the whole time, prepared well in advance of our Sacramento meetings. And
I remember thinking to myself at the time: This is all about the Chester
family vacation! This is the elaborate scenario concocted by Mr. Chester
in order to put the best spin on his failure to negotiate with this
union, declare his oft-stated intention to seek impasse (in a quick memo
to his boss)...and take the wife and kids to "Didneyland!" Whoopee.
This entire bargaining experience with the University has been like
"X-treme Didneyland"...like bargaining with Cruella DeVille. And Goofy.
And sure enough, next came the Impasse-Song...sing along everybody: "We
are trying our best to get an agreement...we think we are at
impasse...we're preparing for declaration of impasse." Badda-bing,
badda boom. It's a small world after all.
CUE's Amatullah assured Mr. Chester that we would oppose this action
with every resource at our disposal, and she proposed new bargaining
dates to take place at UC San Diego. He said he would get back to us.
Three days later, he did. He faxed us a letter at CUE State
Headquarters...and my, what a fine letter it was. Self-righteous and
self-pitying, he began by expressing his "disappointment and continuing
frustration with CUE's inability or unwillingness to make our
negotiation sessions productive." From beginning to end (2 pages
later), this Assistant Director of Labor Relations whined and complained
that he'd had to wait for our proposals (as we have had to wait for
his), and then when he'd got them they weren't what he wanted...and if
he didn't get what he wanted he was going to file for Impasse with
PERB. (And take his dolls-and-dishes/bat-and-ball?) Three days later,
he sent us ANOTHER letter saying he was going on vacation (See? Damn, I
love when I'm right!) August 2 thru 16, and likely wouldn't be
available for his vision of "pre-impasse mediation" till after that
date. He copied all of us: his boss, Executive Director Howard Pripas
(who must be wondering by now why he's still in this mess with CUE when
the Berkeley Lab settled with the union a month ago...Lab Negotiator Bill
Elkins just looks better and better, owes Pete a thank-you card)...his
"University Bargaining Team" (dang, who would THAT be?...I might be
wrong, but it's my impression that people who've served on his team
don't much like him, either)...and Labor Relations Managers system-wide,
poor dears, who are only confused by his professed victimization at the
hands of this recalcitrant and unreasonable group of CUE women.
"YOU'RE ONLY AS TALL AS YOU STAND" (Phil Ochs)
Frankly, I'm proud as the dickens of these recalcitrant and unreasonable
CUE women. And I can't imagine a less suitable University Bargaining
agent than...well, you know.
Think it's time to put a shout out to Judy Boyette. She's the
University's Associate Vice-President of Human Resources &
Benefits...Peter Chester's boss' boss on the org-chart, higher than
Howard Pripas. Ultimately, "relations" with the University's workers
are her responsibility, and her boys don't seem to be getting the job
done. She's been a little disengaged lately what with having to take
bullets for UC before the state Legislature--Senator Jackie Speier...(pop,
pop, pop! Where's that info on UC's "cost-savings for staff
turnover?" pop! pop!)--and replace a few key people in the troubled HR
food chain...I'm just wondering if she's embarrassed enough yet. It's
all on your watch, Madam...all on your resume. Like to help out a little?
The upshot is:
- CUE requires an honest negotiating relationship with the
University...
- and the University apparently wants to run to mommie at PERB
(the Public Employment Relations Board)--now all stacked up with
anti-labor Arnie's new appointees. That's some strategy.
And, of course, the University's Negotiator wants to go on vacation.
Well, dang, Pete...so do we.
(Oh, that's right...I'm laid off...I'm ALWAYS on vacation.)
FRIENDS DON'T LET FRIENDS WORK Un-CUE-ed
Can't bring myself to grind anybody about joining CUE anymore. If you
don't see the importance of it, or you just don't like joining stuff,
it's all the same to me. Joining is cheap, effective, and easy...And it
entitles you to run for office soon in new statewide and local elections,
which I hope lots of you will do. You can now JOIN CUE ONLINE at:
http://www.cueunion.org/membership_info/membformweb.pdf
Fill out the form, print, sign and mail or fax it. Trouble is, if you
don't sign up, your employer thinks you don't care how you're
treated. Or paid. But whether you're a member or not, if you need help
here at UCLA Local 4, visit our website (below) or call our mighty
Organizers:
- HERSHEL STROTHER, 310/473-8710
- HUETEOTL ("Wa TAY oh") LOPEZ, 310/473-8910
Unity is Intelligent. Fun. And Powerful.
--BT
(Bert Thomas, CUE's UCLA Bargaining Representative)
7.30.2005
All previous "
NOTES FROM THE BARGAINING BUBBLE" are
available on the web.
Or get your Bubbles at the
UCLA website.