Coalition of University Employees (CUE)
CUE TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010
 2855 Telegraph Ave., Suite #301, Berkeley, CA 94705
 Contact CUE  (510) 845-2221 (phone), (510) 845-7444 (FAX)

CUE:   Home    General Info    Contacts    Issues    News    Bargaining    Member Info    Locals    Events / Corresp    Finance    Stewards / Grievances    CUE Supervisors    Local Resources    General Resources    Links    Site Feedback    Contact CUE  
Bargaining:   Contract    Bargaining Team    Current Reports    Report Archives    Bargaining History    Local Bargaining    Impasse    Correspondence    Observers  
2000-2003 Reports:   1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    12    13    14    15    16    17    18    19    20    21    22    23    24    25    26  

2000-2003 Second Contract Negotiations

Bargaining Report No. 6

August 1-3, 2001

To jump to the first, previous, next, or last bargaining report, click on the appropriate navigation button:  First Previous Next Last 

Bargaining Update #6: August 1-3, 2001, UCLA

Summary:

  1. CUE tries to strengthen seniority protections.
  2. UC wants to eliminate the administrative holiday if they give Cesar Chavez day
  3. Respectful Fair Treatment - what does it mean? How do we enforce it?
  4. Take the Health and Safety survey!

CUE and UC met for three days at UCLA, August 1-3, 2001. UC continued to give responses to CUE's proposals.

1. SENIORITY PROTECTIONS IN LAYOFF LANGUAGE

We discussed the article on Layoff at length. CUE has proposed to greatly limit UC's ability to use "special skills" as a reason for laying off someone out of seniority order. This is important because UC currently uses the excuse of "special skills" to pick and choose who to lay off (generally laying off a more senior employee instead of a favorite employee with questionable "special skills"), and this erodes the strength of seniority. CUE believes that the phrase "special skills" needs to be clear, quantifiable, and narrowly defined. Examples might be speaking a foreign language, competence with medical terminology or knowledge of an unusual computer software. UC described "special skills" as something as vague as "being able to keep a department running with no interruption." UC's definition makes a mockery of seniority and gives management the right to base layoff decisions on vague, subjective judgment. This is the kind of language that can be used to protect discriminatory practices and the exercise of favoritism. While UC has initially rejected CUE's proposal to limit the meaning of "special skills", we are continuing to discuss this matter.

UC gave CUE written counter proposals on Transfer, Promotion & Reclassification, Holidays, Payroll Deductions, Catastrophic Leave and Vacation in which they agreed to some minor changes. In almost every case where CUE proposed substantive changes, UC rejected our proposals. The CUE team was disappointed that UC simply offered "current contract language" in response to CUE's proposals on many of the other articles. However, all issues are still on the table.

2. ADMINISTRATIVE HOLIDAY VS. CESAR CHAVEZ DAY

Rather cynically, UC is proposing to replace our current administrative holiday with the Cesar Chavez holiday by renaming the existing holiday. CUE's proposal is that the Cesar Chavez holiday should be added to the existing holidays. The matter is still unresolved.

CUE gave UC a proposal on the one article besides wages that we have not discussed. We propose to simply eliminate the "No Strikes" language in our current contract.

CUE and UC have agreed to discuss wages at our next bargaining session which is scheduled for San Francisco on August 15-17, 2001.

On Thursday, UCLA CUE and UPTE members had a lively supportive picket line outside of the bargaining building, which we very much appreciated.

3. TALKS CONTINUE ON RESPECTFUL/FAIR TREATMENT

On Friday morning, the CUE team was joined by CUE president Claudia Horning (a library assistant at UCLA) and we spent nearly 2 hours in a "labor management meeting" discussing implementation of the Respectful/Fair Treatment article that we bargained in our first contract with UC. CUE bargainers gave overwhelming evidence to support our position that stringent standards should be set for compliance with this new contract article and that meaningful remedies should be allowed when the article is violated. CUE had previously offered UC guidelines for determining "respectful/fair treatment" and proposed remedies to be used when those standards had been breached. UC did not agree to our proposal and no conclusions have yet been reached. Both sides said that the discussion had been useful.

4. NEW SURVEY ON HEALTH & SAFETY

Finally, we urge you to take the Health & Safety survey that is on CUE's web page. You should have received a notice earlier in the week about it. Your participation will be very helpful in bargaining on this issue.

Future bargaining:

August 15-17, 2001 at San Francisco
August 28-30, 2001 at Santa Cruz
September 13-14, 2001 at Davis

Please join us when we're in your area. And, if you have an opinion or comments for the bargaining team, please send it to us right away. We want to know what you think!

CUE's Bargaining Team:

Margy Wilkinson, Chief Negotiator
Chris Benoit, Lead Negotiator
Mark Covington, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Becky Croll, Davis
Piccola Evans, Berkeley / UCOP
Deborah Freeman, San Francisco
Jody Galluzzi, San Diego
Elaine Hernandez, Irvine
Jack Joshua, Santa Barbara
Connie McGrath, Riverside
Zoe Sodja, Santa Cruz
Anita Windom-Jones, Los Angeles

To jump to the first, previous, next, or last bargaining report, click on the appropriate navigation button:  First Previous Next Last 

http://www.cueunion.org/bargaining/2000-2003/bargrep6.php        12-February-2012 03:02:35
Copyright © 2011 CUE UNION.  All Rights Reserved.